Join us for a presentation by Erika Tjostheim comparing the traditional 30:2 CPR and compressions only CPR in the paper titled CPR compression strategy 30:2 is difficult to adhere to, but has better survival than continuous chest compressions when done correctly, by Schmicker et al. Are better outcomes found when CPR is performed in intervals of 30 broken up by 2 breaths or when CPR is performed continuously along with ventilation support? Tune in to find out!

Unfortunately this article will need to be accessed through an institutional (University / College / AHS / Covenant Health) library. Let us know if you have any access issues!:

Schmicker, R.H., et al. CPR compression strategy 30:2 is difficult to adhere to, but has better survival than continuous chest compressions when done correctly. Resuscitation, 2021, 167, 31-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resuscitation.2021.05.027.

The Zoom invite for the July meeting will be sent out a few days prior to the meeting.